Discover the most popular and inspiring quotes and sayings on the topic of Neoliberalism. Share them with your friends on social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, or your personal blogs, and let the world be inspired by their powerful messages. Here are the Top 100 Neoliberalism Quotes And Sayings by 91 Authors including Ha-Joon Chang,Edward Norton,P. J. O'rourke,Newt Gingrich,H.g.wells for you to enjoy and share.
Gore Vidal, the American writer, once described the American economic system as 'free enterprise for the poor and socialism for the rich'. Macroeconomic policy on the global scale is a bit like that. It is Keynesianism for the rich countries and monetarism for the poor.
It's ginned up by the corporate plutocracy as a way of distracting the working-class people that it's screwing. We hamstring our own natural progressivism in this country, and that's really stupid.
At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.
[The Clinton health care initiative is] washed-over old-time bureaucratic liberalism, or centralized bureaucratic socialism.
The New Deal is plainly an attempt to achieve a working socialism and avert a social collapse in America; it is extraordinarily parallel to the successive 'policies' and 'Plans' of the Russian experiment. Americans shirk the word 'socialism', but what else can one call it?
Chesterton spoke of 'the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal.' It would be hard to sum up liberalism for succinctly.
The free lunch is the essence of modern liberalism.
One nanny said, "Feed a cold"; she was a neo-Keynesian. Another nanny said, "Starve a cold"; she was a monetarist.
RADICALISM, n. The conservatism of to-morrow injected into the affairs of to-day.
Liberalism is the philosophy for our time, because it does not try to conserve every tradition of the past, because it does not apply to new problems the old doctrinaire solutions, because it is prepared to experiment and innovate and because it knows that the past is less important than the future.
Such terms as communism, socialism, Fabianism, the welfare state, Nazism, fascism, state interventionism, egalitarianism, the planned economy, the New Deal, the Fair Deal, the New Frontier are simply different labels for much the same thing.
Liberal politics meant the politics of common-sense.
Socialism, hypnotism, patriotism, materialism, fools making laws for the breaking of jaws.
LIBERAL, n. A man with his mind open at both ends.
Conservative, (New York, Beaufort Books,
A short time ago the demagogues blamed capitalism for the poverty of the masses. Today they rather blame capitalism for the "affluence" that it bestows upon the common man.
Neo-Liberalism promised us a Global Village and gave us a Potemkin Village.
The party that called itself liberal aimed at respecting the liberty to dispose of one's own goods
Global laissez-faire is not a conspiracy of corporate America. It is a tragedy - one of several that have occurred in the twentieth century - in which an hubristic ideology runs aground on enduring human needs that it has failed to comprehend.
A liberal is a man who is willing to spend somebody else's money.
The liberality of one who has much, in permitting one who has nothing to get all that he can.
Capitalism: Teach a man to fish, but the fish he catches aren't his. They belong to the person paying him to fish, and if he's lucky, he might get paid enough to buy a few fish for himself.
Liberalism, the dominant ideology of our time, has been dangerously distorted by the impact of economism. It is that impact which has knocked the citizen off his pedestal and replaced him with the consumer.
Whatever the Left touches
the arts; the economy; health care; the soul; religion
it destroys or damages
The assumption that you everyone else is like you. That you are the world. The disease of consumer capitalism. The complacent solipsism.
Laissez-faire, supply and demand-one begins to be weary of all that. Leave all to egotism, to ravenous greed of money, of pleasure, of applause-it is the gospel of despair.
The process of neoliberalization has, however, entailed much 'creative destruction',
The worldview of the Left is a battle between rich and poor
Conservative resistance to change, that's all,
Capitalistic Anarchism ? Oh, yes, if you choose to call it so. Names are indifferent to me; I am not afraid of bugaboos. Let it be so, then, capitalistic Anarchism.
In today's impoverished dialogue, critiques of liberalism are often naively called "conservative," as if twenty-five hundred years of Western intellectual tradition presented no other alternatives.
The essence of neo-colonialism is that the State which is subject to it is, in theory, independent and has all the outward trappings of international sovereignty. In reality its economic system and thus its political policy is directed from outside.
The old liberal rebelled against taxation without responsibility, the new liberal wants the taxation as a handout without responsibility.
The enemy of liberal capitalism today is not so much socialism as nihilism.
Refuting the false promises requires philosophic understanding of economic interventionism, central banking, and the deeply flawed foreign policy of meddling in the affairs of other nations.
What I have been talking about for many years is opportunity conservatism, that every policy should focus like a laser on easing the means of ascent up the economic ladder.
The liberal agenda is the blueprint for national ruin.
The tone and tendency of liberalism ... is to attack the institutions of the country under the name of reform and to make war on the manners and customs of the people under the pretext of progress.
Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.
Like it doesn't cater to the rich and abandon the poor
The move towards neoliberalism in Britain was intimately bound up with the embrace of the U.S. as the country to be aped and copied.
Our world today is in the grip of anti-capitalism. State bureaucracies ruling over anti-market policies have grown into ideological and political elites who arrogantly presume to know and dictate how we should all live and work.
What precisely is this disease that causes inflation and all these other troubles? It has many popular names, such as socialism, communism, state interventionism, and welfare statism.
Mass inflation, welfare line, gross economy, trade it all for what's behind curtain number three.
Careerism: the self-centered philosophy of governing to win the next election above all else.
Our policy is directed not against any country or doctrine but against hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos. Its purpose should be the revival of a working economy in the world so as to permit the emergence of political and social conditions in which free institutions can exist.
Socialism for rich bankers and capitalism for everyone else.
Unfettered capitalism is a revolutionary force that consumes greater and greater numbers of human lives until it finally consumes itself.
For me, liberals are people who seek to use government to promote the general welfare.
Although the big word on the left is 'compassion,' the big agenda on the left is dependency.
Instead of ideological objectives of a political nature, today we are faced with ideological objectives of economic nature.
Reagonomics - a blend of monetarism and fiscal Keynesianism swathed in classical liberal and supply-side rhetoric - is in no way going to solve the problem of inflationary depression or of the business cycle.
A classical liberal is someone who wants a society that maximizes peace, civility, tolerance, and well-being for everyone. One that opens opportunities for everyone to advance themselves.
Democracy has become Empire's euphemism for neo-liberal capitalism.
Choice dependent on wealth; those are the Tory words.
I think the idea that giant profitable corporations should pay their workers enough so that they don't need food stamps - since when is that left-wing? How did that become 'leftie?' That doesn't seem leftie to me. That seems common sense.
The progressive and liberal mindset believes that to every problem there is a Washington, D.C., solution,
The privileged liberal position: There should be equal rights for all; I should not have to share my riches with the poor.
The economic egalitarianism of the liberal ideology implies ... the reduction of Westerners to hunger and poverty.
It is socialism. It moves the country in a direction which is not good for anyone, whether they be young or old. It charts a course from which there will be no turning back.
Libertarianism is rejected by the modern left - which preaches individualism but practices collectivism. Capitalism is rejected by the modern right-which preaches enterprise but practices protectionism.
So-called Individualism is the social and economic laissez-faire: the exploitation of the masses by the classes by means of legal trickery, spiritual debasement and systematic indoctrination of the servile spirit, which process is known as 'education'.
Liberals want the government to get bigger, and they want you to drive smaller cars, and they want to dictate the way you live.
A modern liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's compulsory.
If i were pressed to give my brand of political thought a label, I would call it pessimistic anarchistic quietism
Individual capitalists, in short, behave in such a way as to threaten the conditions that permit the reproduction of the capitalist class.
The core of the Marxist critique of capitalism is that although the individual capitalist is rational (as liberals assume), the capitalist system itself is irrational.
A populist is someone who fights for common sense economic policies that sustain and expand the middle class.
Modern liberalism has many roots. One of the most important is the ideas of a man described by an American critic as 'his satanic free-trade majesty John Stuart Mill' and revered by others.
MySchool not OurSchools. In the basic logic of policy, there is now no difference between Labor and Liberal/National parties. The unchallenged assumption of national and state policy is that whatever problem exists, market logic can fix it.
A liberal is a man who wants to use his own ideas on things in preference to generations who he knows know more than he does.
Companionate Conservatism - Making the streets safer before people are kicked out onto them.
Socialism and interventionism. Both have in common the goal of subordinating the individual unconditionally to the state.
For the South African White minority, neo-liberalism is apartheid with a clean conscience, called Democracy.
A new generation gladly abandons its critical and skeptical faculties. Old slogans and hatreds are dusted off. What was only recently muttered guiltily is now offered as political axiom and agenda.
As far as social-economic theory is concerned, I am still a Marxist
It's the idea that we as people can control our own destinies. The government and the corporations, more even than the government, can't dictate what artwork we're supposed to like or what comedy we're supposed to laugh at.
Not only does the liberal paradigm not even come close to agreeing with the social and economic reality on the ground today, worse, it has largely congealed into a political religion ...
Inflationism is that monetary policy that seeks to increase the quantity of money.
When, in the works of Lacan, Deleuze and Althusser, the nonsense machine began to crank out its impenetrable sentences, of which nothing could be understood except that they all had "capitalism" as their target, it looked as though Nothing had at last found its voice.
To understand the Left, one must understand that in its view the greatest evil is material inequality. The Left is more troubled by economic inequality than by evil as humanity has generally understood the term.
The principle of real leadership ignored, the immortal objects of society forgotten, practical conservatism degenerated into mere laudation of private enterprise, economic policy almost wholly surrendered to special interests.
I'm someone who believes in centrist governing philosophy.
I know of no better name than Anarchism.
Liberalism had come to mean spending more on everything-speech police, failed poverty programs that reward dependence, a bigger nanny state telling us we cannot eat fatty foods, workplace roles that stifle opportunity, and absurd environmental regulations.
Anarcho-capitalism: the realization that the only way to effectively govern the market is to have an effective market in governance.
Extremists, who thrive on conflict; who do not tolerate diversity; who seek power through division and destruction. The global system they hope to create is one of new walls and new isolation, and radically smaller horizons. It is an anti-democratic, anti-economic-growth, and anti-progress agenda.
The capitalist system is not delivering those decade-after-decade increases it promised. We're not where we should be in terms of our national economies. We don't know how to get out of this malaise and I think we now have to consider more radical policies.
A rich man told me recently that a liberal is a man who tells other people what to do with their money.
Ambition will take you And ride you too far and Conservatism bring you to boredom once more Sit down by the river And watch the stream flow Recall all the dreams That you once used to know The things you've forgotten That took you away To pastures not greener but meaner.
Since the end of the Cold War, metropolitan elites everywhere have identified progress and modernity with the cornucopia of global capitalism, the consolidation of liberal democratic regimes and the secular ethic of consumerism.
Give me the centralism of liberty; give me the imperialism of equal rights.
The idea of liberalism has to be recreated. In the course of time it has lost so much of its clarity and attraction that it first has to rise like a new dawn in front of the people.
Marxists are people whose insides are torn up day after day because they want to rule the world and no one will even publish their letter to the editor.
Liberalism is a religion. Its tenets cannot be proved, its capacity for waste and destruction demonstrated. But it affords a feeling of spiritual rectitude at little or no cost.
Zionism, like other self-determination movements ...
Bourgeois political economy ... never gets to see man who is its real subject. It disregards the essence of man and his history and is thus in the profoundest sense not a 'science of people' but of non-people and of an inhuman world of objects and commodities.
Many of the left thinkers that really matter to me - that formed a big part of my thinking about politics and art - emphasize how capitalism is a totality, how there's no escape from it, no outside.
Modern American liberalism is nothing but the socialism too stupid to recognize itself in the mirror.
I would say practical progressive, which means that the Republican party or any political party has got to recognize the problems of a growing and complex industrial civilization. And I don't think the Republican party is really wide awake to that.